HETHERINGTON
MAGAZINE CAMERA NO. 2
United
States Camera Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 1893-1895
Introduced in 1893 as a less expensive model to the
Hetherington Magazine Camera No. 1, the Hetherington Magazine Camera No. 2 was
designed to hold six 4x5 plates. The
plates were advanced by the same system used in the larger, more expensive No.
1, via a removable clock key. The plate
chamber was accessible through sliding panels at the top and underneath. The enclosed shutter was cycled by moving the
dial at front in either direction to a pre-set tension, then releasing it by
buttons located on top.
Both Hetherington Magazine Cameras No. 1 and No. 2 were no
longer offered in E. & H.T. Anthony's Illustrated
Catalogue, Photographic Equipments and Materials for Amateurs by
December, 1895. The No. 1 had been priced
at $45 versus the No. 2 at $25, both being equipped with Darlot lenses. The Hetherington Magazine Camera No. 2's design
was covered by the same patents as the No. 1, with all of the patents being
granted to Frederick A. Hetherington: Patent
No. 396,656 dated January 22, 1889 (magazine plate holder), Patent No. 436,855 dated
September 23, 1890 (shutter), Patent No.
460,099 dated September 22, 1891 (sliding top cover), Patent No. 463,123 dated
November 10, 1891 (aperture control), Patent No. 476,203 dated May 31, 1892 (
plate carrier), Patent No. 483,688 dated October 4, 1892 (camera design) and
Patent No. 502,857 dated August 8, 1893 (plate changing design) this last one
being assigned to the United States Camera Company of Indianapolis, Indiana.
Source: Google Patents
On January 9, 1893, F.A. Hetherington, Thomas E. Hibben and Harold B. Hibben incorporated as
the United States Camera Company of Indianapolis. The announcement in Wilson's Photographic Magazine, Volume XXX for 1893,
inferred that production of the Hetherington Magazine Camera (No. 1) would
continue based upon orders recently received that exceeded last year's business
and from overseas orders for their splendid magazine camera. It also stated that "another cheaper one
will be made, too." The Pacific Coast Photographer for
February 1893, stated that Hetherington & Hibben have now
incorporated their business under the title of "The United States Camera
Co." and that "they now have ready for the market in addition to
their Prize Magazine Camera, a very attractive magazine box holding six plates
with the Gray Lens which will be sold for $25.00. The well known stock house of
H. Lieber & Co., of Indianapolis, Ind., are constituted trade agents for
the United States."
The No. 2 differs significantly from the No. 1 in its
construction, although both models utilized the same plate advancing design. The larger
No. 1 utilized a clockwork shutter mechanism, allowing it to be wound for
one-hundred exposures. The No. 2 uses a
simpler shutter requiring that it be cycled for each exposure. Although both the No. 1 and No. 2 were
offered with a Darlot lens in Anthony's 1894 and 1895 catalogues, this example is equipped with a lens marked
"R.D. Gray, New York" as stated in the Pacific Coast Photographer announcement. This suggests that
the R.D. Gray lens was used earlier in production, with the Darlot lens being
used towards the end. The No. 2's top
access door also differs from the No. 1's, in that it simply slides open after
lifting a catch, versus depressing the viewfinder glass on the No. 1. The
No. 2 measures 6 1/4" high (including feet) X
5-7/8" wide X 8-3/4" deep , versus the standard (12-plate capacity) No. 1 which
measures 6 x 7+ x 11+.
Other than Anthony's 1894 and 1895 catalogues, we have
been unable to find any other advertisements for the No. 2. The State
of Indiana Secretary of State's Report for the Period Ending October 31, 1896,
no longer lists the United States Camera Company.
Despite its greater simplicity and a
significantly lower price, the No. 2 is actually much rarer than the larger,
No. 1 size and I have never encountered another example. Suffice it to say that any Hetherington
Magazine Camera is rare, with the No. 1 being seen very infrequently. The No. 2 appears to have been made for about
a year, owing to why it is almost never seen today.
No. 1
No. 2